Great! I'll post it in my group. One of our members is especially interested in tracking success of predictions as a proxy for expertise. I'll be honest - I'm personally opposed to relying on expertise as a proxy for truth in any solution, but I'm in the minority, I think. My argument is that I'm not against expertise per se - I believe …
Great! I'll post it in my group. One of our members is especially interested in tracking success of predictions as a proxy for expertise. I'll be honest - I'm personally opposed to relying on expertise as a proxy for truth in any solution, but I'm in the minority, I think. My argument is that I'm not against expertise per se - I believe it's the best we can do until we have a better system - but relying on expertise is too susceptible to vectors of attack ("do your own research", "Big Pharma" (or Soros or...)). So is majority opinion ("sheeple").
I've only skimmed the topics so far, but it looks very interesting, and readable. I'm reading now.
Great! I'll post it in my group. One of our members is especially interested in tracking success of predictions as a proxy for expertise. I'll be honest - I'm personally opposed to relying on expertise as a proxy for truth in any solution, but I'm in the minority, I think. My argument is that I'm not against expertise per se - I believe it's the best we can do until we have a better system - but relying on expertise is too susceptible to vectors of attack ("do your own research", "Big Pharma" (or Soros or...)). So is majority opinion ("sheeple").
I've only skimmed the topics so far, but it looks very interesting, and readable. I'm reading now.