The feeling I have is such deja-vu. The Caltech LGB group was prevented at the last moment in 1985 from hosting a speaker from Johns-Hopkins (who was a Harvard Fellow) on "Lust, Love and Limerance" because "Lust" was unacceptable in the title.
The deplatforming on the right and left are therefore fundamentally different. If the Newman people object to Catholic institutions hosting anti-Catholic speakers or performances that is different from Palestinian supporters objecting to Jewish speakers at secular institutions. Nazis and Skokie and all that but would you consider it deplatforming if a Jewish institution didn't allow neoNazis to speak? Or if a HBCU did not welcome the KKK?
But -- taking issue with the author, not you -- it is absurd to compare religiously based objections to speakers whose views on abortion or gay marriage explicitly oppose the raison d'être of the institution to Harvard/Stanford/Michigan's opposition to common views that 60+% of Americans hold or held recently.
Mostly small, explicitly religious institutions probably educate 1 or 2% of all American university students. Note that I exclude large, nominally religious institutions that are more-or-less nearly secular at this point, such as Notre Dame. (I went to such an institution decades ago and it was more-or-less secular even then.)
I see no contradiction between expecting large, secular universities to welcome all sorts of viewpoints while also expecting (even hoping) that small, religious institutions conduct their religious missions.
The feeling I have is such deja-vu. The Caltech LGB group was prevented at the last moment in 1985 from hosting a speaker from Johns-Hopkins (who was a Harvard Fellow) on "Lust, Love and Limerance" because "Lust" was unacceptable in the title.
The deplatforming on the right and left are therefore fundamentally different. If the Newman people object to Catholic institutions hosting anti-Catholic speakers or performances that is different from Palestinian supporters objecting to Jewish speakers at secular institutions. Nazis and Skokie and all that but would you consider it deplatforming if a Jewish institution didn't allow neoNazis to speak? Or if a HBCU did not welcome the KKK?
Whats the left /right % for the whole dataset?
FIRE has supported our local underground socialist student paper. Just recently they posted my essay criticizing the Colleges' Title IX & DEI program: https://bereatorch.com/2024/03/08/deconstructing-the-baffling-bull-behind-title-ix-at-our-college/
“College isn’t the place to go for ideas.”
-Helen Keller
Where are all these right-wing protesters depicted on the charts? I never see any in real life.
Religious institutions mostly
Well, that sounds correct.
But -- taking issue with the author, not you -- it is absurd to compare religiously based objections to speakers whose views on abortion or gay marriage explicitly oppose the raison d'être of the institution to Harvard/Stanford/Michigan's opposition to common views that 60+% of Americans hold or held recently.
Mostly small, explicitly religious institutions probably educate 1 or 2% of all American university students. Note that I exclude large, nominally religious institutions that are more-or-less nearly secular at this point, such as Notre Dame. (I went to such an institution decades ago and it was more-or-less secular even then.)
I see no contradiction between expecting large, secular universities to welcome all sorts of viewpoints while also expecting (even hoping) that small, religious institutions conduct their religious missions.