Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Voltaire's Ghost's avatar

Don't think this article will play well in Europe who sent this message: Dear Trump-Americans,

Now we Europeans have to disclose our social media activity from the last five years if we want to travel to the US. Anyone who criticizes Trump can be denied entry.

Let's say it clear: We never want to hear anything about "freedom of speech", "democracy" etc. from you again.

Andy G's avatar

I have a question about the Texas case:

The people in question are public employees.

The speech in question is what they teach to students as employees of the state.

Why does the state as employer not have a legit public interest in what its employees teach? How is this different from setting curricula?

Surely at least non-tenured faculty do not have the right to teach whatever it is that strikes their fancy in their classroom. How is this any different from that?

Do not misunderstand: I am *not* sure that there is nothing wrong with the law in question. But I’m not sure I understand why your argument explains how it is a First Amendment violation.

Could you please explain?

5 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?