Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Clever Pseudonym's avatar

"...if you focus your regulation on the goal of equal outcomes, you will have to keep upping the ante every time equal outcomes don’t occur (which will basically be always)..."

This is the engine of the Left's Permanent Revolution, which is really the will-to-power of adversary intellectuals funded and lauded by American academia and our liberal gentry: an infinite moral, political, social and epistemic crusade for the Left priesthood to own and operate our entire cognitive infrastructure and to be the official embodiment of the True and the Good.

And as utopia is always just beyond our grasp, there will always be more commissars needed, more rules and laws and speech codes, more Struggle Sessions and lessons in etiquette, all with the goal of making us passive puppets who obey on command and are programmed to regurgiate approved dogma.

It seems that the West is just stuck with a permanent class of moral entrepreneurs who are always wielding heavy doses of guilt and shame, always demanding we repent and atone for original sin and bow down to their sacred commandments—the faith may be different, but we seem to have no way to rid us of these meddlesome priests.

Expand full comment
Margo Margan's avatar

I remember experiencing the same liberal guilt at my high school. FIRE has been incredible for me. I'm a fiction writer, in addition to writing articles (you might've seen me at The Coddling Substack!) I used to go to great lengths to delete and destroy any stories that contained a small piece of language deemed "offensive" by some. Every time I release a story with controversial ideas now, I remind myself I have free speech to do so!

AI has been a tense topic in my community thanks to artists perceiving it as stealing their jobs and their work. While I agree that there are ethical concerns to be heard here, I'm not sure if training a device on many artworks or written works it observes a small portion of is considered copyright infringement - then I'd also owe royalties to every book I've ever read (or at least be considered a thief!) for influencing my language development. And I don't want to restrict the use of tools in an admittedly competitive field, one that nobody is entitled too given we may stop caring about any given entertainment product any day now... It's not a role like teachers or lawyers where we need personnel for a clear societal purpose.

My point being, I'm taking advantage of my free speech here... But despite the many important perspectives in this conversation, not just my own, I feel like that's an easy way to be guilted into AI bans too. And not all, but some pockets of artist culture are already filled with that kind of "liberal guilt" you mention!

Anyways, thanks for the piece and for doing the work that you do.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts